CleanTechies
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Clean Transportation
    • Energy Efficiency
    • Green Building
    • Renewable Energy
    • Recycling & Waste
    • Water & Conservation
  • Jobs
    • Find Cleantech Jobs
    • Post a Job
    • Manage Your Job Listings
    • Submit Your Resumé
    • Search Cleantech Resumés
  • Contact
    • Editorial
      • General Inquiries
      • Article Submission
    • Advertising
      • Advertising & Sponsorship
      • Guidelines
      • Media Kit
  • About
Top Posts
OIl Companies Admit Climate Change Is Real In...
Toyota Planning 1st Megawatt-Scale, 100% Renewable Energy Powered...
India-based Solar IPP Azure Power Raises $500 Million...
India Cancels Solar+Storage Auctions Due To High Costs
India Needs To Do More To Achieve 175...
Indian State Asks Solar Developers To Voluntarily Reduce...
Too Much Solar Power: Indian State Refuses Power...
China Warns India Against Prospective Anti-dumping Duties On...
India May Withdraw Support For Renewable Energy By...
India Auctions 500 Megawatts Rooftop Solar Capacity With...

CleanTechies

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Clean Transportation
    • Energy Efficiency
    • Green Building
    • Renewable Energy
    • Recycling & Waste
    • Water & Conservation
  • Jobs
    • Find Cleantech Jobs
    • Post a Job
    • Manage Your Job Listings
    • Submit Your Resumé
    • Search Cleantech Resumés
  • Contact
    • Editorial
      • General Inquiries
      • Article Submission
    • Advertising
      • Advertising & Sponsorship
      • Guidelines
      • Media Kit
  • About
Author

Environmental News Network

Environmental News Network

The Environmental News Network (ENN) is one of the oldest, and most unbiased sources of online environmental news on the web. ENN has consistently earned the loyalty of the most respected insiders like the heads of sustainability at Fortune 500 companies, government leaders or leaders of the largest non-profits.

New Mechanism Behind Arctic Warming Revealed

New Mechanism Behind Arctic Warming Revealed

written by Environmental News Network

We all know that greenhouse gases contribute to global warming, but new research identifies a new mechanism that could turn out to be a major contributor to melting sea ice, specifically in the Arctic region.

Scientists from the US Department of Energy’s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) have studied a long-wavelength region of the electromagnetic spectrum called far infrared. Far infrared is a region in the infrared spectrum of electromagnetic radiation. While it is invisible to our eyes, it accounts for about half the energy emitted by the Earth’s surface.

Despite its importance in the planet’s energy budget, it’s difficult to measure a surface’s effectiveness in emitting far-infrared energy. In addition, its influence on the planet’s climate is not well represented in climate models.

Current models assume that all surfaces are 100 percent efficient in emitting far-infrared energy. However, scientists found that open oceans are much less efficient than sea ice when it comes to emitting in the far-infrared region of the spectrum. This means that the Arctic Ocean traps much of the energy in far-infrared radiation, a previously unknown phenomenon that is likely contributing to the warming of the polar climate.

“Far-infrared surface emissivity is an unexplored topic, but it deserves more attention. Our research found that non-frozen surfaces are poor emitters compared to frozen surfaces. And this discrepancy has a much bigger impact on the polar climate than today’s models indicate,” says Daniel Feldman, a scientist in Berkeley Lab’s Earth Sciences Division and lead author of the paper.

Simulations conducted by the researchers revealed that far-infrared surface emissions have the biggest impact on the climates of arid high-latitude and high-altitude regions.

In the Arctic, the simulations found that open oceans hold more far-infrared energy than sea ice, resulting in warmer oceans, melting sea ice, and a 2-degree Celsius increase in the polar climate after only a 25-year run.

This could help explain why polar warming is most pronounced during the three-month winter when there is no sun.

“The Earth continues to emit energy in the far infrared during the polar winter,” Feldman says. “And because ocean surfaces trap this energy, the system is warmer throughout the year as opposed to only when the sun is out.”

Their research appeared this week in the online early edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.



November 7, 2014 0 comment
0 Facebook Twitter Google + Pinterest
The Future of Vertical Farming

The Future of Vertical Farming

written by Environmental News Network

From big company agricultural farming, to communal farming or even personal agronomy, the business of growing crops for an expanding global population will be crucial in the near future.

The two most important resources needed to run these farms are one, water, and two, land. But these resources often come at a premium, especially with growing populations and increased food demand. Farmers and researchers have already started leaning towards genetic engineering and industrial processing to help with their crop yields, but a new solution in agribusiness is emerging. Vertical farming.

“Vertical farming” was coined back in 1915, but the practice has not yet become mainstream. That is, until now. Stacked greenhouses that use artificial light to grow crops have numerous benefits and the business itself is starting to take off.

Last year, PlantLab began the construction of a $22-million, 200,000-square-foot headquarters, including multiple plant production units (PPUs) and research units.

PlantLab’s claims that a PPU the size of a city block and just a few stories high could produce the same volume of high-quality crops as a large farm, while consuming fewer resources. Water used for the plants does not evaporate or runoff, and because of this, PPUs consume only about 10 percent as much water as traditional farms. Other benefits include no pesticides and that the plants are protected from weather-related problems.

PPUs allow production to occur locally (thereby reducing transport costs and wastage) and on demand, under controllable conditions. In other words, any kind of fruit or vegetable can be grown anywhere, year-round.

Not only do PPUs offer major savings in terms of resources and transportation; they are also not prohibitively expensive to build. Indeed, for something like $100 million, a partner could purchase the required land and construct a 500,000-square-foot (46,450 m2) PPU, with ten growing levels about five feet apart.

The resulting farm would employ about 200 people for seeding, growing, harvesting, packaging, sales, logistics, maintenance, and management. And it would supply 50,000 people with a consistently high-quality seven-ounce daily requirement of fresh herbs, vegetables, and ground fruits like berries for at least ten years—all in less space that the average multi-story parking lot. This might sound expensive. But, at just $2,000 per person, the cost is far lower than the $8,000 the average American spends in annual health-care costs. Given that a PPU will last for at least a decade, and offer considerable health benefits to local populations, it is a small price to pay.



September 19, 2014 3 comments
0 Facebook Twitter Google + Pinterest
How is a Warming Climate Impacting Coral Reefs?

How is a Warming Climate Impacting Coral Reefs?

written by Environmental News Network

How is a warming climate impacting life in the oceans? Fish can move to cooler areas, but coral reefs are anchored in place.

Late-summer water temperatures near the Florida Keys were warmer by nearly 2 degrees Fahrenheit in the last several decades compared to a century earlier, according to a new study by the U.S. Geological Survey.

Researchers indicate that the warmer water temperatures are stressing corals and increasing the number of bleaching events, where corals become white resulting from a loss of their symbiotic algae. The corals can starve to death if the condition is prolonged.

“Our analysis shows that corals in the study areas are now regularly experiencing temperatures above 84 F during July, August and September; average temperatures that were seldom reached 120 years ago,” said Ilsa Kuffner, a USGS research marine biologist and the study’s lead author. “When corals are exposed to water temperatures above 84 F they grow more slowly and, during extended exposure periods, can stop growing altogether or die.”

The new analysis compares water temperatures during two time periods a century apart at two of Florida’s historic offshore lighthouses – Fowey Rocks Lighthouse, off Miami, and Carysfort Reef Lighthouse, off Key Largo, Florida. The first period included data from 1879 to 1912, while the second period spanned from 1991 to 2012. Temperatures at a third area, a reef off Islamorada, Florida, were also monitored from 1975 to 2007.

“What’s interesting is that the temperature increase observed during this recent 32-year period was as large as that measured at the lighthouses spanning 120 years,” said Kuffner. “This makes it likely the warming observed at the lighthouses has actually occurred since the 1970s.”

The study indicates that August is consistently the month when Florida’s ocean temperatures peak. In the analysis of recent decades, average temperatures for August have been at or very close to 86 F. At Fowey Lighthouse from 1879 to 1912, the average August temperature was just 84.2 F. Temperatures this August at the same location, though not included in the study, averaged 87 F.

Coral bleaching is currently underway in the Florida Keys, highlighting the real-time impact that warmer ocean temperatures are having on reefs. Corals can recover from bleaching if the waters cool down within a few weeks, but mortality usually ensues if corals remain bleached longer than a month or two.

The study, “A century of ocean warming on Florida Keys Coral reefs: Historic in-situ observations,” was recently published in the journal Estuaries and Coastsand is available via open access.

Article by Roger Greenway



September 12, 2014 3 comments
0 Facebook Twitter Google + Pinterest
Levels of Air Toxics Decreasing Across US Cities

Levels of Air Toxics Decreasing Across US Cities

written by Environmental News Network

More and more people are living in our cities. They are great places to live, exciting, good jobs, great night life, but also sometimes congestion and unhealthy air quality. The latter problems are improving, however. Efforts to make cities livable without driving are paying off. Bike lanes, bike sharing, and efforts to reduce auto traffic and congestion are helping to improve the air quality in our cities.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) this week released its Second Integrated Urban Air Toxics Report to Congress – the final of two reports required under the Clean Air Act (CAA) to inform Congress of progress in reducing public health risks from urban air toxics.

“This report gives everyone fighting for clean air a lot to be proud of because for more than 40 years we have been protecting Americans — preventing illness and improving our quality of life by cutting air pollution – all while the economy has more than tripled,” said EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy. “But we know our work is not done yet. At the core of EPA’s mission is the pursuit of environmental justice – striving for clean air, water and healthy land for every American; and we are committed to reducing remaining pollution, especially in low-income neighborhoods.”

Using national emissions and air quality data, the Urban Air Toxics Report shows the substantial progress that has been made to reduce air toxics across the country since the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990.

  • A 66 percent reduction in benzene;
  • A nearly 60 percent reduction in mercury from man-made sources like coal-fired power plants;
  • An 84 percent decrease of lead in outdoor air, which slows brain development in children;
  • The removal of an estimated 1.5 million tons per year of air toxics like arsenic, benzene, lead and nickel from stationary sources and another 1.5 million tons per year (about 50 percent) of air toxics from mobile sources. This is significant because air toxics (also referred to as hazardous air pollutants or HAPs) are known or suspected of causing cancer and can damage the immune, respiratory, neurological, reproductive and developmental systems; and
  • Approximately 3 million tons per year of criteria pollutants, like particulate matter and sulfur dioxide, have been reduced as co-benefits of air toxics reductions.

“Reducing toxics is a top priority for EPA, and even with this progress, we continue to improve our understanding of them, so we can effectively reduce remaining risks, particularly in overburdened communities. EPA’s Plan EJ 2014, is making sure environmental justice is addressed in programs and policies across the agency. EPA is working closely with state, local and tribal agencies to promote area-wide and regional strategies to address air toxics and support a number of community-based programs that help communities understand, prioritize and reduce exposures to toxic pollutants in their local environment. For example, in Indianapolis, we are working with partners on the ground through an EPA grant for the “Building Lead Safe Communities” Project in the Martindale-Brightwood and Nearwest neighborhoods. We’re addressing the risk of toxic lead exposure in children through outreach efforts and compiling block level soil lead data, identifying hotspots utilizing air sampling and developing synergistic local solutions.”

Article by Roger Greenway.



August 26, 2014 0 comment
0 Facebook Twitter Google + Pinterest
Cigarette Butts Recycled into Coating for Supercapacitors

Cigarette Butts Recycled into Coating for Supercapacitors

written by Environmental News Network

It is estimated that as many as 5.6 trillion used-cigarettes, or 766,571 metric tons, are deposited into the environment worldwide every year.

That’s a lot of litter, especially when it takes 18 months to 10 years for cigarette filters to degrade!

However, these butts may have a newly discovered second use as a group of South Korean scientists have converted these cigarette leftovers into a high-performing material that could be integrated into computers, handheld devices, electrical vehicles and wind turbines.

But for what purpose exactly?

It is hoped the material can be used to coat the electrodes of supercapacitors—electrochemical components that can store extremely large amounts of electrical energy—while also offering a solution to the growing environmental problem caused by used-cigarette filters.

The researchers have demonstrated the material’s superior performance compared to commercially available carbon, graphene and carbon nanotubes.

Co-author of the study Professor Jongheop Yi, from Seoul National University, said: “Our study has shown that used-cigarette filters can be transformed into a high-performing carbon-based material using a simple one step process, which simultaneously offers a green solution to meeting the energy demands of society.

“Numerous countries are developing strict regulations to avoid the trillions of toxic and non-biodegradable used-cigarette filters that are disposed of into the environment each year—our method is just one way of achieving this.”

In their study, the researchers demonstrated that the cellulose acetate fibres that cigarette filters are mostly composed of could be transformed into a carbon-based material using a simple, one-step burning technique called pyrolysis.

As a result of this burning process, the resulting carbon-based material contained a number of tiny pores, increasing its performance as a supercapacitive material.

“A high-performing supercapacitor material should have a large surface area, which can be achieved by incorporating a large number of small pores into the material,” continued Professor Yi.

“A combination of different pore sizes ensures that the material has high power densities, which is an essential property in a supercapacitor for the fast charging and discharging.”

Once fabricated, the carbon-based material was attached to an electrode and tested in a three-electrode system to see how well the material could adsorb electrolyte ions (charge) and then release electrolyte ions (discharge).

The material stored a higher amount of electrical energy than commercially available carbon and also had a higher amount of storage compared to graphene and carbon nanotubes, as reported in previous studies.

The study can be found in the in IOP Publishing’s journal Nanotechnology.

Read more at EurkeAlert!



August 6, 2014 2 comments
0 Facebook Twitter Google + Pinterest
Only 10% of Wind Farm Fires Reported

Only 10% of Wind Farm Fires Reported

written by Environmental News Network

Wind farming is one of the leading industries in the renewable energy sector. The process is simple: wind turns the blades, which spin a shaft, which connects to a generator and makes electricity. However, converting this kinetic energy into mechanical power has resulted in quite a few wind turbines catching fire, and according to researchers not all fires are being fully reported.

Researchers from Imperial College London, the University of Edinburgh and SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden carried out a global assessment of the world’s wind farms, which in total contain an estimated 200,000 turbines. The team found that ten times more fires are happening than are being reported. Instead of an average of 11.7 fires each year, which is what is reported publicly, the researchers estimate that more than 117 separate fires are breaking out in turbines annually.

By comparison, with other energy industries, fire accidents are much less frequent in wind turbines than other sectors such as oil and gas, which globally has thousands of fire accidents per year. However, fire accidents can have a considerable economic impact on the wind farm industry, say the team.

Wind turbines catch fire because highly flammable materials such as hydraulic oil and plastics are in close proximity to machinery and electrical wires. These can ignite a fire if they overheat or are faulty. Lots of oxygen, in the form of high winds, can quickly fan a fire inside a turbine. Once ignited, the chances of fighting the blaze are slim due to the height of the wind turbine and the remote locations that they are often in.

The researchers attribute fire ignition in wind to lightning strike, electrical malfunction, mechanical failure, and errors with maintenance.

In an effort to get a clearer picture about the true extent of fires in wind farms, the team carried out an extensive analysis of data from a wide range of sources. This included Government reports, data from anti- wind farm lobbyists and information gathered by major newspaper investigations.

The research has been published in the journal Fire Safety Science.

Read more at the Imperial College of London.



July 21, 2014 0 comment
0 Facebook Twitter Google + Pinterest
Sand Power: A Better Battery

Sand Power: A Better Battery

written by Environmental News Network

Technology of the future is hard to see coming — sometimes because you can’t see it.

Advances in nanotechnology are the driving force behind longer lasting Lithium-ion batteries.

Currently, Lithium-ion batteries are used to power every-day technologies like cell phones, computers, cameras and cars. Their energy source is a carbon-based graphite anode, which is nothing short of polarizing. Battery life has always been a major concern with Li-ion batteries.

The solution is the most abundant compound in the earth’s crust: SiO2,­ or — more commonly — sand. The next generation of battery technology is using sand as a source for the production of nano-silicon, an anode material for Li-ion batteries.

Batteries operate by electron flow. Electrons gather at the negative end of the battery and move towards the positive end when a conductive material connects the two. In this fashion, electrons move from the anode to the cathode, powering whatever may be connected in-between.

Batteries, unfortunately, contain a finite amount of energy available to power this electrochemical difference. That is where sand comes in.

Research has shown that the silicon-based SiO2 has a high energy capacity and its anodes are estimated to last 3 times the lifespan of its carbon-based competitor. In addition to this obvious benefit, silicon-backed Li-ion batteries are easily recharged and weigh less than traditional Li-ion batteries.

As far as the process of purifying sand for use in the battery goes, results are a bit coarse. Quartz grains undergo a 300% volume expansion during lithiation, making the silica particles larger and more susceptible to fracture.

Even when the materials separate properly, it comes at a cost. The source material may be cheap, but the preparation is not — the nanostructures created in the process are not yet cost-effective to be produced at the kilogram level.

Nonetheless, sand remains a readily available, non-toxic, environmentally friendly solution to a better battery.

For more information visit University of California, Riverside.



July 17, 2014 0 comment
0 Facebook Twitter Google + Pinterest
Light Rail Systems Improve Air Pollution in Cities

Light Rail Systems Improve Air Pollution in Cities

written by Environmental News Network

Have you ever wondered if the cute light rail systems some large cities are installing actually get people out of their cars and have a positive environmental impact?

For the first time, researchers have shown that installing light rail on an existing traffic corridor not only gets people out of their cars, but reduces congestion and air pollution.

In the study, planners at the University of Utah measured impacts of a new light rail line in Salt Lake City (University Line) on an existing major thoroughfare (400/500 South). Their analysis showed that traffic near the University has fallen to levels not seen since the 1980s, even as the number of students, faculty and staff at the U has increased, and the commercial district along the corridor has expanded.

“This is the first study to document important effects of light rail transit on traffic volumes,” said Reid Ewing, professor of city and metropolitan planning at the University of Utah and lead author on the study. “Since the University TRAX line opened, there has been increased development in the 400/500 South travel corridor, yet traffic on the street has actually declined. Our calculations show that without the University TRAX line, there would be at least 9,300 more cars per day on 400/500 South, and possibly as many as 21,700 additional cars. The line avoids gridlock, as well as saves an additional 13 tons of toxic air pollutants. This is important knowledge for shaping future transportation policies.”

Andrew Gruber, executive director of the Wasatch Front Regional Council, which has been responsible for coordinating transportation planning in the Salt Lake and Ogden areas since 1973 said, “This study further demonstrates the value of public transportation in helping people reach their destinations, reduce traffic and spur economic development. The findings are significant for local governments across our region as they consider the future of transit in their community.”

The report—which validates assumptions widely used in travel demand models used in community planning—was issued recently by the National Institute for Transportation and Communities, and has been accepted for publication in the “Journal of Public Transportation” later this year. The report is available for download here.

Article by Roger Greenway.



July 14, 2014 2 comments
0 Facebook Twitter Google + Pinterest
Getting a Better Handle on CO2, NASA Will Help!

Getting a Better Handle on CO2, NASA Will Help!

written by Environmental News Network

From all the news about how anthropogenic emissions of CO2 are increasing tremendously (remember the hockey stick graph?) you would think that these emissions are causing all the atmospheric increases of CO2. And, our use of fossil fuels is increasing exponentially, with more than half of all fossil fuels ever used by humans being consumed in the last 20 years.

However, in comparison with the amount of carbon that enters the atmosphere from natural sources, our fossil fuel emissions are modest. “Carbon dioxide generated by human activities amounts to only a few percent of the total yearly atmospheric uptake or loss of carbon dioxide from plant life and geochemical processes on land and in the ocean,” said Gregg Marland, a professor in the Geology Department of Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina. “This may not seem like much, but humans have essentially tipped the balance.”

Scientists are able to accurately measure the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, both today and in the past, and the impact of our activities is apparent in those measurements. Before the Industrial Revolution, there were about 280 molecules of carbon dioxide out of every million molecules in the atmosphere, that is, 280 parts per million. By 2014, the concentration had risen to about 400 parts per million.

Although we know the concentration of carbon dioxide, much about the processes that govern the gas’s atmospheric concentration remains a mystery. We still do not know precisely where all of the carbon dioxide comes from and where it is being stored when it leaves the air. That information is crucial for understanding the impact of human activities on climate and for evaluating options for mitigating or adapting to climate change.

Scientists expect to get some answers soon to these and other compelling carbon questions, thanks to the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2, a new Earth-orbiting NASA satellite scheduled to launch on July 1. OCO-2 will allow scientists to record detailed daily measurements of carbon dioxide — around 100,000 measurements of the gas around the world every day.

“Now that humans are acknowledging the environmental effects of our dependence on fossil fuels and other carbon dioxide-emitting activities, our goal is to analyze the sources and sinks of this carbon dioxide and to find better ways to manage it,” Marland said.

Article by Roger Greenway.



June 26, 2014 3 comments
0 Facebook Twitter Google + Pinterest
Are We Close to Bringing Back Supersonic Travel?

Are We Close to Bringing Back Supersonic Travel?

written by Environmental News Network

Remember the Concorde?  The supersonic passenger jet that flew from 1969 to almost 2000.  It was not cost effective for the airlines, and extravagantly expensive for passengers. It was also cramped.  The luxury was being able to fly from New York to London in about 3 hours!

The Concorde had a big problem, the sonic boom it created when flying at supersonic speed.  This led to governments restricting where it could fly supersonically and was a major factor in it not being economical to continue flying.  That and a very advanced airframe that was getting old.

The return of supersonic passenger travel may be coming closer to reality thanks to NASA’s efforts to define a new standard for low sonic booms.

Several NASA aeronautics researchers will present their work in Atlanta this week at Aviation 2014, an annual event of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.  They will share with the global aviation community the progress they are making in overcoming some of the biggest hurdles to supersonic passenger travel.

The research generates data crucial for developing a low-boom standard for the civil aviation industry.  NASA works closely with the Federal Aviation Administration and the international aerospace community, including the International Civil Aviation Organization, to gather data and develop new procedures and requirements that may help in a reconsideration of the current ban on supersonic flight over land.

“Lessening sonic booms — shock waves caused by an aircraft flying faster than the speed of sound — is the most significant hurdle to reintroducing commercial supersonic flight,” said Peter Coen, head of the High Speed Project in NASA’s Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate at the agency’s Headquarters in Washington.  “Other barriers include high altitude emissions, fuel efficiency and community noise around airports.”

Engineers at NASA centers in California, Ohio and Virginia that conduct aviation research are tackling sonic booms from a number of angles, including how to design a low-boom aircraft and characterize the noise.  NASA researchers have studied how to quantify the loudness and annoyance of the boom by asking people to listen to the sounds in a specially designed noise test chamber.

A recent flight research campaign at NASA’s Armstrong Flight Research Center in Edwards, California, had residents explore ways to assess the public’s response to sonic booms in a real-world setting. Researchers at Armstrong have an advantage — pilots are permitted to fly at supersonic speeds because the facility is located on Edwards Air Force Base.

“People here are more familiar with sonic booms,” said Armstrong aerospace engineer Larry Cliatt. “Eventually, we want to take this to a broader level of people who have never heard a sonic boom.”

Article by Roger Greenway.



June 18, 2014 0 comment
0 Facebook Twitter Google + Pinterest
EU Reacts to Obama’s Clean Power Plan

EU Reacts to Obama’s Clean Power Plan

written by Environmental News Network

After the US EPA announced their plan to cut US power plant emissions 30% by 2030, the European Union (EU) reacts, praising the Emission Performance Standard (EPS) for its vision while serving as a “positive signal” to other countries.

”This proposed rule is the strongest action ever taken by the U.S. government to fight climate change,” the EU’s climate action commissioner, Connie Hedegaard said in a reaction statement. “If implemented as planned, this measure will help the country meet its 2020 emissions target.”

2020 emissions targets refer to reductions previously committed to by Obama which are well below the Kyoto Protocol commitments.

Hedegaard saw hope in Obama’s announcement for next year’s Paris summit which is intended to finalize a successor to the Kyoto deal which expired in 2012. “But for Paris to deliver what is needed to stay below a 2°C increase in global temperature, all countries, including the United States, must do even more than what this reduction trajectory indicates,” she said.

The new plan will cap greenhouse gas emissions from 1600 US power stations, even though 600 of them are powered by coal and around half may have difficulty meeting the new standard.

As well as cutting CO2 emissions, the new EPS anticipates a 1.5% annual increase in energy efficiency, and a reduction in particle, sulphur dioxide and nitrogen pollution by more than 25%, according to the US EPA.

The EPA also expects the new rule to cut electricity bills by 8% and avert as many as 6,600 premature deaths, 150,000 asthma attacks in children, and up to 490,000 missed work or school days, saving some $93 billion in the process.

Many European green groups though were energized Obama’s move, with 11 heavy-hitters including Greenpeace, WWF Europe and Birdlife putting out a statement calling for reciprocal EU action.

“Europe has long claimed leadership on climate action, but has seen rising emissions from coal power stations due to the low CO2 price and cheaper coal imports,” it says. “This is a threat to both Europe’s delivery of domestic decarbonisation and to its international influence.”



June 4, 2014 0 comment
0 Facebook Twitter Google + Pinterest
EPA Doles Out Grants to Replace Old Diesel Engines on Tug Boats

EPA Doles Out Grants to Replace Old Diesel Engines on Tug Boats

written by Environmental News Network

The shipping industry is one of the most under-regulated industries in the world due to outdated and international regulations that are difficult to enforce on a global scale. And as these ships enter our harbors and ports close to home, their operations have the potential to generate smog-forming emissions and other pollutants that are linked to various health problems in susceptible populations.

In an effort to combat some of the pollution expelled from dirty diesel engines, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has allotted over one million dollars to help two specific organizations replace their old engines with less polluting models.

According to the EPA, the projects will cut emissions of harmful nitrogen oxides and particulate matter among other pollutants which are linked to asthma, lung and heart disease and premature death.

Diesel engines often remain in use a long time. Older diesel engines that predate current and stricter air pollution standards emit large amounts of air pollutants. EPA grants such as those announced today are helping to reduce air pollution from some of the more than 11 million older diesel engines that continue to emit higher levels of pollution.

“Older diesel engines generate significant amounts of air pollution that can make people sick,” said EPA Regional Administrator, Judith A. Enck. “Replacing or retrofitting old polluting diesel engines reduces people’s exposure to pollutants that can lead to asthma attacks and other respiratory ailments, lost work days and many other health impacts.”

The Connecticut Maritime Foundation, a not-for-profit organization, will use a $600,000 EPA grant to replace two old engines on the Patrick J. Hunt, an 80-foot marine tug boat, which operates out of New York harbor, with new and cleaner EPA-certified engines. The new engines are estimated to emit 40% less nitrogen oxides and 62% less particulate matter than the current engine. The project is expected to reduce emissions of nitrogen oxides by 17.9 tons per year and particulate matter by 1 ton per year in addition to conserving 10,825 gallons of fuel annually.

The New Jersey Clean Cities Coalition, a not-for-profit organization, will use a $587,918 EPA grant to replace the old engines in two tug boats and one supply boat that operate out of New York harbor with new and cleaner EPA-certified engines. The new engines are estimated to emit 69% less nitrogen oxides and 80% less particulate matter than the current engines. The project is expected to reduce emissions of nitrogen oxides by 816.2 tons and particulate matter by 40.6 tons over the life of the engines in addition to conserving between 1.8 and 2.25 million gallons of fuel over a lifetime of about 12 years.

Article by Allison Winter.



May 28, 2014 0 comment
0 Facebook Twitter Google + Pinterest
Why Don’t Commercial Building Owners Install Modern Controls?

Why Don’t Commercial Building Owners Install Modern Controls?

written by Environmental News Network

Commercial buildings use large amounts of electricity and natural gas. Significant reductions in energy use can be achieved by installing new modern systems but this requires a significant capital cost.

It is possible to install modern control systems at much lower cost and these can also significantly reduce energy use, and improve comfort at the same time! A new study by the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory shows that commercial buildings could cut their heating and cooling electricity use by an average of 57 percent with advanced energy-efficiency controls, according to a year-long trial of the controls at malls, grocery stores and other buildings across the country. The study demonstrated higher energy savings than what was predicted in earlier computer simulations by the same researchers.

“We’ve long known that heating and cooling are among the biggest energy consumers in buildings, largely because most buildings don’t use sophisticated controls,” said the study’s lead researcher, engineer Srinivas Katipamula of the Department of Energy’s Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. “But our tests of controls installed at real, working commercial buildings clearly demonstrate how much more energy efficient air-conditioning systems can be.”

This research was supported by DOE’s Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy and the Bonneville Power Administration.

Sitting on the roofs of many commercial buildings are shiny metal boxes containing heating, cooling, ventilation and air conditioning (also known as HVAC) units. These are pre-made in a factory and have all their components inside a box, leading the industry to call them “packaged” HVAC units. Another kind of commercial HVAC, called air handling units, have long used sophisticated controls to ensure they work as efficiently as possible. But packaged units are often allowed to run for hours on end, even if they aren’t needed, and receive little maintenance.

Article by Roger Greenway



May 27, 2014 0 comment
0 Facebook Twitter Google + Pinterest
How to Green Your Barbecue This Summer

How to Green Your Barbecue This Summer

written by Environmental News Network

Memorial Day, the unofficial start of summer and outdoor cooking season is right around the corner. Unfortunately, outdoor cooking is too often connected with a tremendous amount of waste. Make this year’s summer the “summer of green” with these eco-friendly alternatives for a low-impact summer barbecue:

1. Washable Dishes and Cutlery

We use paper plates and plastic cutlery because we’re afraid of breakage and we don’t like washing them. But this year, ditch the paper plates and plastic cups and use real, eco-friendly dinnerware. The risk of breakage is minimal over grass. If disposable is an absolute MUST, use compostable products like bamboo.

2. Cloth Napkins

Over 3,000 tons of paper towel waste is produced in the U.S. daily. One ton of them consume 20,000 gallons of water and 17 trees. Consider instead leaving a stack of cloth napkins for guests and providing a hamper for collection and washing. If you prefer not to buy cloth napkins, make your own.

3. A Low-Carbon Grill

Grilling is one of the barbecue’s largest contributors to the carbon footprint. Cheaper charcoals are full of chemicals and contribute to air pollution. Instead, consider ‘natural charcoal’ made from hardwood that contains no additives thereby producing less ash. Natural gas comes from fracking, which also has several negative environmental side affects. For a cleaner option, consider purchasing an electric, infrared grill or even a solar grill. Check out 5 Green Grilling Options for a Smog-Free Summer.

4. Local Veggies 

The freshest, most nutritious food can be found at the local farmer’s market. Purchase fresh vegetables the morning of the barbecue and support a local farmer while you’re at it.

5. Recycling and Composting Bins

Provide a separate bin for recyclables and food scraps making for easy transfer to municipal recycling bins. In this way people can reduce landfill waste.

6. DIY Condiments

Ketchup, mustard, and relish are staples at any American barbecue, but reduce waste by making your own and storing it in reusable glass jars. Learn about 4 Homemade Condiment Recipes.

7. Natural Bug Repellent

Instead of using commercial toxic sprays, make your own natural repellent or try one of these three chemical-free gadgets.

8. Solar-Powered Tunes

Invest in a solar powered boombox to play your background backyard tunes. Use on-board Bluetooth technology to stream your favorite station and the sun’s free energy to keep your phone charged!

9. Reusable Bags and Storage Containers

Use reusable cloth bags to bring home barbecue supplies. Minimize plastic garbage bags by using larger, washable boxes or containers like those made by Rubbermaid for transferring recyclables or carrying dinnerware without damaging it.

Article by Robin Blackstone.

 



May 22, 2014 0 comment
0 Facebook Twitter Google + Pinterest
Newer Posts
Older Posts

Ad

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Google+
  • RSS

Ad

Top Posts & Pages

  • Piezoelectric Flooring: Harvesting Energy Using Footsteps
    Piezoelectric Flooring: Harvesting Energy Using Footsteps
  • Top Ten Sustainability Initiatives of Starbucks Corporation
    Top Ten Sustainability Initiatives of Starbucks Corporation
  • Top 3 Resume Examples on How to Highlight Key Accomplishments
    Top 3 Resume Examples on How to Highlight Key Accomplishments
  • 5 Characteristics of a Professionally Written Resume
    5 Characteristics of a Professionally Written Resume
  • Top Ten Sustainability Initiatives of Nike
    Top Ten Sustainability Initiatives of Nike

Ad

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google +
  • Linkedin
  • RSS

The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by, and do not necessarily represent the views of Sustainable Enterprises Media, Inc., its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.


Back To Top