No Coal-Fired Power Plants Built in Past Two Years

The Washington Post has announced that in 2010, not a single new coal-fired power plant was constructed in the United States. This marks the second year in a row in which this has occurred. Coal remains the most abundantly used source of electricity, accounting for half of all power generation. However, a number of factors, such as the economy, lower natural gas prices, and environmentalist opposition, have effectively halted the growth of the coal industry.

Coal is being dumped in favor of natural gas, which due to extensive exploration and production, has a significantly lower price than in the past. Much of the new gas production is in shale rock, which have recently been unlocked due to new technologies. Reserves of shale gas are believed to be vast in North America and elsewhere, rivaling the oil reserves of the Middle East.

America’s largest electricity generator, American Electric Power (AEP), plans to turn to natural gas for any additional electrical capacity. The price of natural gas straight from the wellhead stood at about $4.25 per thousand cubic feet in 2010, well below its historic average price. According to a report from Deutsche Bank, if gas prices stay below $6, more plants will be converting from coal to gas.

“Coal is a dead man walkin’,” says Kevin Parker, global head of asset management and a member of the executive committee at Deutsche Bank. “Banks won’t finance them. Insurance companies won’t insure them. The EPA is coming after them…And the economics to make it clean don’t work.”

But coal is not completely dead yet. Last year, the coal industry

managed to kill the climate legislation (cap and trade) in the US Senate, showing it still has a lot of influence in politics and public opinion. Plus, even as it declines, it remains the number one source of electricity in America.

However, the coal industry is under a heavy assault from the Environmental Protection Agency. Starting this year, new EPA regulations take effect to lower greenhouse gas emissions of power plants emitting over 75,000 tons of carbon dioxide per year. Such a rule would force industry to install state-of-the-art emissions controls on new construction in order to obtain the necessary air permits. For a dirty fossil fuel like coal, the added cost of new controls can make it economically prohibitive, accelerating the conversion to natural gas.

Fights among lawmakers and in the courts can be expected as the new regulations begin to take effect. Many Republicans plan to block or hamstring the EPA’s efforts. Nevertheless, overall demand for coal power is decreasing in the United States. From 2000 to 2008, 19 new coal-fired plants were constructed. In 2010, plans to build 38 new plants were abandoned, and an additional 48 plants were mothballed. For the sake of the environment, let’s hope this trend continues.

Article by David A. Gabel, appearing courtesy Environmental News Network.

Have any Question or Comment?

5 comments on “No Coal-Fired Power Plants Built in Past Two Years

The number of the abandoned projects surprises me, that’s an awful lot! The recession surely was the main reason, but thank god for such a development. At least something good came out of the recession. Let’s hope harder times will boost efficient decision making like this. I also think that with a rise of electric cars, there is a lot of new natural gas plants to come.


This is bullshit. San Antonio had a coal-plant open up in 2010, so the Washington Post has some erroneous facts.

Harry Tuttle

Its surprising to me the Democrats have done such a complete turn around and implemented the old energy program we had just before President Carter. We were converting over to natural gas to get away from dirty coal.

US President Carter in 1977 declared the world at peak oil, and that all oil would be gone in the 1990’s. He said, since natural gas came from oil fields, and were being shut down, it made sense to order the USA to shift all new power plants to coal, and had natural gas electrical generators outlawed.

Coal was also used to replace the hydroelectric dam projects he cancelled, to save delicate canyon ecologies. From 1977 to 1997 they were fierce about any attempts to replace coal (I myself moved upwind), and now here we are back to natural gas.

I don’t think coal will be out of the picture because of recessions and the increase demand in shale gas.We all know coal is very accessible and very cheap.There is time that coal will go down but because we have a lot of coal here we will still be using coal.

Harry Tuttle

Better to export it maybe? All the west coast ports were beefing up to handle increased exports to China.

Comments are closed for this post !!
Skip to toolbar