Solar Says ‘Good-Bye Solyndra’

No company has done greater damage to the image of the American solar industry than Solyndra. It was therefore a source of great delight to me last week as I drove along Interstate 880 through Fremont, CA for what I didn’t see. The signs on the old factory were gone. Those persistent thorns in the side of American solar, had finally vanished, closing a chapter in solar history.

It was unfortuante enough that the ill-fated company received DoE loans and then declared bankruptcy. Once the Republican Party attempted to exploit that into what they saw as an Obama scandal, those signs looming over 880 were like knives twisting in the gut of solar.

Let’s face it, the center of influence and legacy expertise for the cleantech industry is in the San Francisco Bay Area. It’s home to 100‘s of cleantech companies, investors and blossoming technologies waiting to be commercialized. Many of us drive 880 on a regular basis and I can only imagine what a persistent cloud of doom those signs were.

How many times did cleantech professionals pass by and feel fear or doubt about their own company ending up like Solyndra? How many times did the signs make a venture capitalist thinks twice about funding a promising cleantech start up? How many times did the signs prevent a homeowner from switching their house to solar?

In my business running a boutique cleantech public relations and social media firm, perception is everything. One’s perception is shaped by their prospective and everything in our world influences that prospective, for good or for bad. If you have something constantly reminding you of your past failures, casting doubts on your abilities and suggesting you have no hope of future success, it is very difficult to succeed. In relationships, we call this mental abuse.

For me, the departure of the signs represents a delightful turning point for the industry. The cloud has been lifted. It’s a symbol that the story of the company’s fall is finally “old news” that no one is interested in any more. The fact that President Obama was so bullish on clean technology in his 2013 State of the Union is testament to this. The Republicans may have gained some short term political leverage by attacking an industry that’s growing at 13% and creating over 13,000 new jobs in this country, but the Obama reelection shows they ultimately did not succeed with the tactic.

As the industry continues to grow and challenge entrenched fossil fuel interests, we can expect more attempts the politicize solar, especially as more states reach grid parity. Ultimately, the solar industry will find it’s mainstream legs and reach a tipping point to being the energy of choice. Until then, it’s up to us as an industry to educate and shape public perception in the industry’s favor.

The Solyndra signs are an example of a negative symbol of the industry that could have been easily removed and should have been as soon as the politicization of the company became apparent. We can be guaranteed the opposition will do their part to shape public and political opinion away from solar. We must be on guard and take action where necessary. It’s up to us to play a better offense in this game. With the signs gone, there’s nothing to remind us we can’t.

Article by Lisa Ann Pinkerton, founder of Women In Cleantech & Sustainability, a networking and career development group dedicated to the advancement of women in various environmental technology sectors. She is also Founder and President of Technica Communications, where she handles public relations and marketing strategies for cleantech and biotech companies. Lisa Ann is a former award-winning broadcast journalist who reported for National Public Radio, PBS Television, WPXI-NBC, American Public Media, and Free Speech TV.

Have any Question or Comment?

4 comments on “Solar Says ‘Good-Bye Solyndra’

Clifford Goudey

Lisa, why the concern over the loss of one mismanaged company. The road to progress is littered with such examples. Those lingering signs were serving a useful purpose for cleantech professionals, venture capitalists and homeowners by reminding them that due diligence is needed. It’s a pity they couldn’t be seen by decision makers at DoE to remind them that hype is no substitute for solid economics. Or doesn’t that matter in boutique cleantech public relations.

Lisa Ann

Clifford, Thanks for your comment. Point well taken. Those signs were up for over 28 months and during that time they did serve the purpose you are describing. My point was towards perception. While due diligence does matter, it’s not my area of expertise and is another topic for another post.

Great article, Lisa. I just started the website Solar Power DIY, and I am also interested in helping women find ways to not only learn more about green energy but also to use it to create sustainable careers. I will be in Palo Alto in October for my 10-year Stanford reunion, and I really hope I’ll be able to attend a Women in Cleantech and Sustainability event. I’m really inspired by your work.

Lisa Ann

GeAndra, Thank you so much for your comment. Please follow up with me at lisaann [at] and we can network before your visit. Perhaps I can introduce you to some people you should meet when you are here?

Comments are closed for this post !!
Skip to toolbar