Some automotive entrepreneurs are feeling like when it comes to getting DOE funding, it’s who, not what you know.
The $2.4 billion in federal funding for advanced battery and vehicle electrification announced this week boosted battery manufacturers that had prior relationships with the DOE, while some lesser-known innovators were left with hat in hand.
Matt Mattila, a consultant in the Rocky Mountain Institute’s Mobility and Vehicle Efficiency Practice says the money “went to the old guard” and left out new EV companies such as Aptera where “$100 million could make or break them.”
Also missing out on funding were battery companies including Valence, Boston Power and Bright Automotive, a company spun out of RMI. The DOE’s funding philosophy was conservative, opting to forego many newer companies while providing funds to perennial research partners Ford, GM and Chrysler.
“There’s huge open space for new guys to make a move, and the funding could have done a lot to accelerate them,” Mattila said.
Felix Kramer of plug-in hybrid advocacy group CalCars.org says the Obama administration’s pledge of transparency and accountability in the allocating recovery program funds has not been completely fulfilled. Cramer wrote today that results so far have been mixed as
“the bulk of the awards went to large established companies — especially automakers and component suppliers.”
The DOE also provided funding not aimed at commercialization or reducing carbon emissions on a grand scale, but instead will share the cost of pilot projects to get a smaller number of plug-in and electric vehicles onto the roads that will result in temporary jobs.
General Motors received $30 million to put 125 Chevrolet Volts on the road; Ford got $30 million to deliver and test 150 plug-in Ford Escape Hybrids; Chrysler received $70 million to deploy 220 plug-in vans and trucks.
While $160 million may seem a lot to test less than 500 vehicles (by comparison, 1,000 professional green jobs could have been paid for), the trials are considered crucial to understanding the performance of the vehicles and the batteries so prior to commercialization, and to share the automaker’s steep development cost.
ECOtality, one of the oldest electric vehicle charging equipment manufacturers (10 years) will install 12,750 charging systems through its eTec subsidiary. The $100 million grant will create small vehicle networks in Portland and three other Oregon cities, three cities in Tennessee, and in Seattle, San Diego, Phoenix and Tucson.
This article originally appeared on Matter Network.
You know what infuriates the taxpayer? When he finds out that grants for electric car development is really big auto bailout funds. $400 million was given away last month to the big auto makers, and not a single penny went to electric car manufacturers. That is a crime, my friends. Obama looked like a complete liar, telling the world he was seeking electric car innovations and small businesses, when all the while he was funneling money to the major car makers. Their models are junk. The public will neve accept a $70k vehicle. Those car makers will never make a single car that people can afford. More than 100 applicants supplied the best technology on Earth to the DOE, and they got ripped off. All those submissions with their breakthrough technologies belong to the government now, and they just handed it over to the big car makers at our expense. Where is the outrage???!!
I did not know that. By the way,I am from S.L.C. Utah. Where can I get info on this algea to bio fuel plant in UT. I read it was a large one. Please tell me… Mike
this is y other countries look downe at us when they used to look up at us, they see what our govermant does to and get away with it we lost respect from the other countries.
ERRA Incorporated, San Antonio, Texas is Chaired by Bernard Reznicek, the former president and CEO of Boston Edison and Omaha Public Power. Regarding ERRA’s YESS (Your Energy Storage Solution) Battery, Mr. Reznicek states: “This is simply the most cost effective energy storage battery module on the planet! Not to be confused with nickel metal hydride batteries which were famous for their high self discharge rates, internal corrosion problems, and relatively short lives, this Ni/H technology has completely compartmentalized the hydrogen in a solid state separate from the battery itself, resulting in no self discharge or corrosion of any kind. The technology is tried and proven, and is based on the same electrochemistry of the batteries that have been powering our satellites in outer space, through hundreds of thousands of charge/discharge cycles, without fail, for over forty years. We feel we are potentially on the brink of being able to largely displace lead acid, nickel metal hydride and lithium ion technologies. This battery is competitive with lead acid in cost, with nickel metal hydride and lithium ion in energy density and is inherently safer than any other known battery technology! This battery has no risk from the thermal runaway issues plaguing the lithium ion technologies. Finally, and equally important, our technology is 100% clean, and fully scalable from AAA sized batteries up through several MW’s of storage capacity.”
Comments are closed.