The internecine battles in the green community are growing in number: there’s pro-renewable versus open space; the anti-hydro crowd; and the nukes or no nukes debate. Add the fight over clean coal, which the Boston Globe editorial staff weighed in on yesterday.
We know from his comments earlier this year that Al Gore essentially sees clean coal as a shell game, and he is being borne out at least in part by the larding of Waxman-Markey with billions to placate coal state legislators.
But, the Globe editorial touches on an interesting geopolitical/economics quandary. The US and Europe may be pushing toward carbon reduction reforms; but, it is the largest and fastest growing emitters in Asia that pose the greatest threat to the planet and are projected to negate even the most ambitious Western reduction estimates.
So, clean carbon technology might be the liar’s lie that Gore claims it is for US energy production, but what about the possibility of developing technology to export? Do we have an obligation to invest in clean coal research for the greater good even if its not in our future?
And, if we do, who should make the investment? The technology that emerges is likely to be immensely valuable, but it also promises to be the kind of technology over which any attempt at proprietary control would be difficult to assert on all fronts: technological, moral, and legal. All of that makes it unlikely that American companies will invest much in the effort.
Which would seem to leave any effort to our newest class of venture investor — the American taxpayer. Joe Six Pack is already going to be heavily invested in emerging renewable technologies, so the extension is not much of a reach.
But, with the banks, the auto companies, and all the other cash that Uncle Sam has already committed, is clean coal investment to give away to developing countries really a good allocation of tax resources?
There is a lot of debate in the climate change movement about the obligations that the Western world now has to emerging economies (the “you had your turn, and now its our time to pollute, so don’t lecture us” line of reasoning). Maybe clean coal is the time to turn this on its head? Let’s tell the Chinese and Indians to take all of their emerging technological might, their strong engineering technocracy, and their CO2-laced revenues and apply it all to find a marketable gasification technology and send it along when you’ve got the killer app.
For the first time in this new global economy, we’ll see what its like when the innovation product life cycle door swings the other way, with the capital investment and technological innovation happening there and the benefits accruing here.
7 comments
It would be great (if it already exists, please point us to it) if there is an informative summary of “clean coal” technology. Is it a myth or is there a potential for the technology? As the post points out, there are a LOT of coal plants all over the world (and growing) and we can’t turn our back on it even if we (the United States) doesn’t ultimately maintain a significant portion of its energy portfolio in coal.
So, educate us (or re-educate us) in the world of clean/competitively clean coal.
Thanks,
Chad M. Wall
The search for ways to reduce carbon emissions has led to government grant money for schemes ranging from promising to wacky. Recognizing that there is no currently viable replacement for fossil fuels, with the possible exception of nuclear power, the US and other countries with large coal deposits are desperately looking for ways to continue burning coal without incurring the wrath of nature or the IPCC. Clear evidence of the seriousness of this effort is evident in this week’s special edition of Science, dedicated to carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) technology. For more on the state of clean coal technology see “Serious Black: The Quest for Clean Coal.”
Chad:
Thanks for reading the post, rating it and taking time to write a comment.
My attempt at an answer follows. “Clean coal” is a catch-all term that could refer to anything from coal gasification technology that converts coal to gas before combustion, to scrubbers that filter out harmful combustion emissions, to carbon sequestration technology that catches and stores the bad stuff.
I don’t know of any definitive impartial study on all the technologies, but some good ones from usually reliable sources are:
– The UN IPCC report on carbon sequestration (http://www.ipcc-wg3.de/activity/publications/special-reports-wgiii/special-report-on-carbon-dioxide-capture-and-storage)
– McKinsey has a study that focuses more on the economics of the question than the tech challenge, but its worth a read (http://www.mckinsey.com/clientservice/ccsi/pdf/CCS_Assessing_the_Economics.pdf)
– Also, DOE has several studies and EPA has done some work on the topic.
joseph
Thanks for the leads and follow-up. It appears from skimming the links you sent me that “clean” coal power plants are at best, in the demonstration phase. Cost is a major complication as is the technology, but it appears there is work going on and there are demonstration / feasibility pilots starting to happen. I received a “tweet” just today from @americaspower that pointed me to a website that is claiming they are piloting new technology for C02 capture. According to the website, there is a pilot project going on in a Pleasant Prairie Power Plant where they are pulling a sample 1.5% from an existing stack, funneling it to the pilot system and removing 90%+ of the C02 from the sample. The website feels like a Publicity Campaign Site, so I’d be interested in your thoughts. Here’s the link: http://www.americaspower.org/factuality
Chad
Even if there is a way to capture the pulluting fumes from Coal based power plants I feel the damage to the surrounding ecosystem and land from open pit or other mining techiniques is enough to phase this method of generation out of our portfolio.
I also feel that we could be the “clean energy middle-east” and sell clean technology to developing countries, if we were the leader in them. Private industry could be contracted by other countries to provide design, construction, installation, clean tech equipment sales and education to China and India, etc. as we do with computers, high tech farm equipment, etc.
Europe (Germany, Spain and Denmark) sells us PV systems and Wind Mills, even makes the PV modules here to then sell in Europe.
Reading this article makes me wonder who emits the most carbon per capita globally. For all the carbon that is up there, the developing countries are to blame. So its their moral obligation to help clean it up and help others clean up as well. While emerging economies are struggling to ensure their citizens have a basic standard of living, you cant expect them to provide vast resources to developing clean coal technologies. They just would use what is abundantly available to them at the cheapest cost.
I think every company,household and individual has a responsibility to reduce their carbon foot print. We as a company are always looking at better, cleaner, greener ways to do this. As you say although work in Europe and the US may be pushing forward to reduce carbon emissions, personally I feel the US has ignored earlier warnings to achieve these goals and even now its half heartily. Here in the UK we have been working on these very things for 30 yrs. Over the past 10 years nearly every household in the country has 3 types of Rubbish/Garbage bins so we at home can start the cycle to recycle, We have recycle skips approx every 2 miles and in every supermarket car park.
Our supermarkets are stopping supplying carrier bags so we must take our own with us to the supermarket. These are all small things but are making a change.
Although the coal and nuclear power issue still remains a tricky one, surely efforts must be made to get nuclear power cleaner and more acceptable. The only way to do that is continue building better more efficient power stations.
England is the windiest country in Europe and we now have a staggering amount of wind power with plans to build more over the coming years, this is the best option for us as we can afford to build such plants, newly developed countries don’t have the money or technologies to do this.
I’m saddened by the rain forests getting smaller each year, but we are standing in the way of there progress, unless we offer real solutions to these problems, it is unrealistic to expect other nations less fortunate than ours to adhere to these morals when we ourselves started the industrial revolution.
Comments are closed.