In the past several decades, there is no question that the opportunity for investment in the clean energy economy has increased exponentially. In fact, the Pew Environment Group predicts that, if legislative policies are initiated by G-20 countries as expected, more than $2.3 trillion will be invested in clean power assets over the next 10 years. This will, no doubt, provide companies enormous opportunities to compete for investments, jobs and export markets.
In 2010, for the first time in decades, the renewable energy sector surpassed the nuclear energy sector worldwide. Global investments in wind energy reached $79 billion, a record level. Much of this growth has been credited to financial incentives for companies that adopt renewable energy sources from countries such as Germany and Italy.
The most current clean energy race numbers available are from 2010. As is to be expected, every type of clean energy, including solar photovoltaic (PV) and wind, saw an increase in usage from the G-20 countries. In total, the global investment in clean energy rose 30 percent in 2010, to a total of $243 billion. Conversely, the use of biofuels dropped significantly in 2010, with G-20 countries showing the lowest investment in the biofuel sector since 2005.
So, globally speaking, who’s winning the race to be the cleanest – energy wise?
Extending its continuing lead among the G-20, China increased its clean energy usage significantly. The total investment in clean energies made by the country increased 39 percent in 2010. Phyllis Cuttino, director of Pew’s Clean Energy Program in Washington, called this increase “remarkable,” noting that the changes in China’s clean energy usage came mainly in the areas of wind turbines. In fact, China is now a world’s leader in the area of wind turbine and solar module production, surprising few experts in the field.
In a surprising turn of events, however, Germany overtook the United States in 2010 to become the second largest clean energy market in the world.
Whereas China’s goal is to establishing 20,000 megawatts of solar energy by 2020, and the European Union has set the goal of generating 20 percent of its power from renewable resources by the same year, the U.S. lacks a similarly concrete goal. In 2009, President Barack Obama’s plan for producing 25 percent of the country’s electricity with renewable resources was nullified by Congress.
The president more recently turned his sights inward, announcing the Better Buildings Initiative with a goal of seeing a 20 percent improvement in energy efficiency by 2020 in the U.S. If this exciting, yet perhaps lofty, goal is achieved, the country’s collective corporate energy bills would decrease by approximately $40 billion.
The country’s focus on saving green duly noted, the U.S. is still lagging behind in efforts to go green, while the rest of the G-20 speeds ahead in the race.
The irony of the U.S. being behind with its renewable energy goals lies in the fact that they are home to some of the best producers of clean energy technologies in the world.
Article by Bari Faye Siegel, a technology writer and marketing consultant at Noveda Technologies, an innovative leader in real-time, web-based energy management, solar PV monitoring and water management. Noveda also offers real-time collaboration tools that leverage social media to educate and empower stakeholder communities and make the smart grid a reality today. For more information, visit www.noveda.com.
5 comments
I disagree with the notion that this is a “race” to be green. We should all be working together to get cleaner energy for everyone.
Although the incentives for investing in renewable energy has increased over the years allowing for a huge in crease in business, exports and jobs in the UK, i still think Britain is running behind. Other countries are investing more on the renewable energy sector and Britain is reduction incentives! In my opinion this puts Britain behind in the race to the ultimate goal of Emission reduction.
Great Read.
Despite spending $243 billion in 2010 for renewable energy, increased demand was more than these renewables could provide. They didn’t make a difference and they won’t even with additional spending.
If climate change is serious (I believe it is) then we’re headed over a cliff in the next decade – speed bumps (wind and solar) are not enough. In fact, they’re a waste of resources. It would require hundreds of millions of acres of land and trillions of dollars to replace coal-generated electricity with wind and solar schemes. We don’t have the land and we don’t have the money.
It’s time to grow up and find a real solution – clean, affordable electricity.
We may not have the land for photovoltaic solar power, but we certainly do for the newer solar power systems. There are a lot of good ideas being patented now and the technology is growing so fast that the best photovoltaic systems could be obsolete before they are even paid for. Hang on to your hats.
All the solar and wind projects we’ve done so far haven’t made any difference – new demand continues to exceed their capacity.
The only real solution would replace coal generated electricity. With solar and wind that would require +$25 trillion. We don’t have that money – or the land.
I’ve heard about “newer” or “better” solar schemes for 30 years. Until they can reliably generate electricity for $.07 a kWh they are simply wasting money that could be better spent seeking a real solution.
Comments are closed.