Wind mills are a clean alternative energy supply but not everyone agrees. The Rhode Island General Assembly’s newly enacted laws facilitating the siting, construction and power-purchase agreements for commercial-grade renewable energy projects took a big hit this week. On September 12th, the town of Charlestown, Rhode Island became a U.S. trendsetter in the renewable energy sector when the Town Council voted to pass the first-in-the-country ban on any size or type of electricity-generating wind turbines. The sweeping prohibition applies to large commercial turbines as well as smaller, residential models.
After working for three years to craft an ordinance that was acceptable to residents, the most recent, and heavily redacted, incarnation of the town’s wind ordinance was passed by a vote of 3 to 2. Council members Greg Avedisian and Marjorie Frank were the dissenting votes, while members Lisa DiBello, Dan Slattery and President Thomas Gentz all cast “yea” votes on the ban.
The idea for an outright ban was borne of the mind of town solicitor Peter Ruggiero. This month would have marked the one-year anniversary of the previous moratorium on wind-turbine construction. According to Ruggiero, Rhode Island case law insists moratoria, by legal definition, should be short term, stopgap measures to allow local governments more time to craft sufficient and efficient ordinances.
“It is better, from a legal standpoint, for the town to enact the ban, and work on crafting a new wind ordinance from the ground up,” Ruggiero said.
When the Town Council was asked by former member Deborah Carney how long the ban was expected to be in place, Councilman Dan Slattery stated that the residential turbine ordinance should be ready in three months and an ordinance concerning commercial turbines should take no more than a year to write. The implied concern was to install wind mills with minimal impact on people’s health or the environment where there has been some controversy.
As the 21st century began, rising concerns over energy security, global warming, and eventual fossil fuel depletion led to an expansion of interest in all available forms of renewable energy. Worldwide there are now many thousands of wind turbines operating, with a total nameplate capacity of 194,400 MW. Europe accounted for 48% of the total in 2009.
A 2009 expert panel review, described as being the most comprehensive to date, delved into the possible adverse health effects of those living close to wind turbines. Their report findings concluded that wind turbines do not directly make people ill.
The 85-page study was sponsored by the Canadian Wind Energy Association and American Wind Energy Association. The academic and medical experts who conducted the study stated that they reached their conclusions independent of their sponsors.
The study did allow that some people could experience stress or irritation caused by the swishing sounds wind turbines produce. “A small minority of those exposed report annoyance and stress associated with noise perception…” [however] “Annoyance is not a disease.” The study group pointed out that similar irritations are produced by local and highway vehicles, as well as from industrial operations and aircraft.
Article by Andy Soos, appearing courtesy Environmental News Network.
2 comments
I would like to ask you if any research has been done in the field of seismic and sound vibrations caused by wind turbines, and in particular on their effects on tectonic plates. Couldn’t they be helping to “unlock” tectonic plates where pressure has been building up along subduction zones? Their vibrations could be producing a similar effect to that of tapping on the lid of a jam jar in order to open it. Engineers do that to remove large flywheels for instance: they apply pressure on the wheel, then give it a few taps with a hammer – and it’s that small vibration that allows the huge flywheel to come off. If it doesn’t, they apply more pressure and use a bigger hammer. Mechanics also use vibrations to unlock things, loosening with a few taps the nuts, bolts, and other parts that have become welded together by time.
I thought of it the other night when an earthquake shook Vancouver: this drew my attention to the recent increase in quake activity around the world. The city has a very large wind turbine, whose vibrations are magnified by skyscraspers etc., all of which are pile-driven into the ground. Could wind turbines be producing vibrations that help release energy that has accumulated in tectonic lock-ups along fault lines? Perhaps it would be worth-while to do some studies on this?This may interest you .>we have now checked out as well as we can 4 sites of earth quakes in different parts of the world . They all fit in with the theory , I think its the vibes that do it , we did find a reverse case in the USA in Syracruse ,where the HAWT own footings fell apart with the vibes , so now that will become a earthquake zone . As they did a mega job during the last year to rebuild the bases . I think ,I am on to something that will answer a lot of ?????. But aslo make others ,but if it saves lifes >> great .
[…] a recent blogpost on Clean Techies, “Wind Mills, Bans, and Possible Ill Effects“, it covers the story of Rhode Island’s prohibition to large commericial turbines as […]
Comments are closed.